To pick up where we left off last week, in this article we look at proposals for amending the VAT Act, which include a move to direct application of 0% VAT to diplomatic and consular offices, update the conditions for registering a fiscal representative with the State Revenue Service (SRS) and ease the terms of the special VAT scheme for imports. We will also look at the margin scheme for second-hand goods and exemptions available to non-domestic taxable persons suppling goods in temporary storage.
Indirect application of 0% VAT means the supplier charges VAT at the standard rate of 21% (or an appropriate reduced rate) and the VAT is duly refunded to the customer.
Direct application of 0% VAT means the supplier of goods or services applies 0% VAT on the transaction right away. Direct application is based on a certificate of exemption from VAT and/or excise.
The proposals affect section 50 of the VAT Act.
The proposals do not change the procedures for applying 0% VAT to diplomatic and consular agents, administrative and technical staff and their family members. In future, 0% VAT will be applied indirectly on supplies of goods and services intended for diplomatic and consular agents, administrative and technical staff and their family members, by refunding the tax paid.
Only the Support for Civilians in Ukraine Act currently provides for applying 0% VAT on supplies to public benefit organisations. By analogy, section 43 of the VAT Act will have subsection 8 stating that 0% VAT applies on goods being supplied free of charge under a contract to public benefit organisations in Latvia or forwarded to a body recognised by another member state that exports those goods out of the EU for humanitarian and charitable purposes.
Such transactions can be supported by a contract and a statement of delivery and acceptance, or another substantially similar document.
The restrictions on registering a fiscal representative with regard to duly filed returns and additional information were vague. The amendments to section 65(1)(4) of the VAT Act state that a taxable person will be registered as a fiscal representative if he has submitted tax returns, informational returns and the annual report to the SRS within the time limits set by the tax legislation and has submitted in writing any additional information required to determine the amount of VAT payable or overpaid within the time limit set by the SRS in the last 12 months. To become a fiscal representative, the late submission of one tax return, informational return and the annual report must not exceed five calendar days in the last 12 months.
As you may know, the special scheme for imports means VAT is ‘paid’ by reporting it on the VAT return, not physically when goods are released for free circulation.
By analogy with the conditions for a fiscal representative, section 85(4)(5) of the VAT Act will include a clause stating that the SRS may give permission to apply the special scheme for imports where a registered taxable person has delayed the submission of one tax return, informational return and the annual report for up to five calendar days in the last 12 months.
The margin scheme for second-hand goods aims to prevent double taxation. It provides for only charging VAT on the difference between the selling price and the acquisition cost because the cost in fact contains the input VAT the seller of second-hand goods was not allowed to deduct.
The VAT Act precisely defines cases where the margin scheme is available.
The VAT directive provides that the margin scheme for second-hand goods, works of art, antiques and collectors’ items is also available for supplies made by a trader (the middleman between the seller and the buyer) if the goods have been supplied to the trader by another taxable person and are exempt from VAT because the input VAT on them was not deducted, as they had been acquired to make exempt transactions or their acquisition was not related to the taxable person’s business, such as luxury, recreation and entertainment expenses.
The current rules of section 138 did not cover all possible situations causing double taxation, and the amendments close this gap.
A taxable person established in another member state or a third country is exempt from VAT registration if his supplies involve moving goods from a Latvian customs warehouse or free zone to other customs warehouses or free zones in Latvia or elsewhere in the EU. This condition was applied to non-Union goods or Union goods with an export procedure launched.
The customs legislation implies that the handling of goods in temporary storage is governed by equivalent conditions to the handling of goods in a customs warehouse or free zone, and goods in temporary storage can be moved between different places of temporary storage. So, if a taxable person established in another member state supplies goods not only in a customs warehouse or free zone but also at a place of temporary storage, the conditions for Latvian VAT registration should apply similarly. Temporary storage is restricted to places of temporary storage or other places indicated or approved by customs offices. The operation of places of temporary storage is subject to a licence issued by customs offices.
Sections 61 and 63 of the VAT Act will be amended accordingly.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionAs you may know, approval of the national medium-term tax policy guidelines, which was supposed to take place by 1 April 2024, has been delayed considerably. It’s not known for sure yet whether and how this will affect VAT treatment in future. However, the Ministry of Finance has drafted proposals for amending the VAT Act, aimed at passing the EU directive to ease the administrative burden on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and to improve the rules for applying 0% VAT and the margin scheme for second-hand goods, works of art, antiques and collectors’ items. The amendments are to come into force on 1 January 2025. This article explores what we see as key changes.
In early July 2024, the European Commission (EC) published its annual report on tax policies across the EU. Value added tax (VAT) is one of the most important taxes in the EU accounting for about 7.5% of GDP and 18.6% of total EU tax revenue in 2022. This article explores the EC’s VAT findings.
In this article, we will explore how the courts ruled on a tax audit where the State Revenue Service (SRS) claimed the company under audit had wrongly deducted input VAT and misapplied a ratio. Although the SRS did not approve the company’s adjustments to its VAT returns and did not refund the VAT it had overpaid, the courts found the penalty and interest charged by the SRS to be justified. This case highlights important lessons for companies to avoid similar problems in the future.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.