State aid and competitive neutrality are the two important principles for public entities that must be respected to ensure the fairness and efficiency of their activities in the market. These principles are essential to prevent market distortions and promote fair competition between public and private companies. While these concepts have recently gained more attention, their interactions have not yet been sufficiently explored. This article discusses how they influence and complement each other.

On 1 January 2025, significant changes to the personal income tax (PIT) legislation came into force. Continuing our tradition, we have prepared an overview of the application of PIT, mandatory national social insurance contributions (MNSIC), and solidarity tax (ST) on salaries and wages in 2025.

In the Baltic countries, the format of the transfer pricing (TP) documentation and the scope of the information to be provided therein are largely uniform and in line with the revised TP documentation standard of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). However, the thresholds set by Latvia and its neighbouring countries, above which the corporate taxpayer (CTP) is obliged to prepare and submit TP documentation to the tax administration annually or upon request, differ significantly. In addition, different deadlines have been set for the preparation of TP documentation and the liability for non-compliance with the mandatory requirements. The approach to determining the arm’s length price (market value) is also different in each of the Baltic countries.

Directive (EU) 2023/2225 requires businesses to provide fair treatment and transparency in their loan ads and credit agreements, promoting the protection of consumer rights and the efficiency of the single market.

E-invoicing is becoming an important tool for businesses around the world, boosting efficiency, reducing the likelihood of errors, and securing tax compliance. Yet companies that have chosen to outsource their accounting function are not sure about who is to take responsibility for implementing and managing e-invoices. This article examines key roles, responsibilities and principles of collaboration that will help companies implement an e-invoicing system successfully.

Businesses, especially those with cross-border operations, are not finding it easy to apply value added tax (VAT).

In the context of domestic as well as cross-border transactions, we have discussed more than once how a customer’s free transfer of equipment to a service provider affects the amount of a subsequent supply of services. In practice, there are situations where a service provider lacks some specific equipment he needs for providing services to a customer, and the customer transfers the necessary equipment to the service provider free of charge. Also, there was uncertainty as to whether such a transactional structure affects the customer’s right to deduct input VAT on the equipment.

In its recent judgment C-475/23 Voestalpine Giesserei Linz GmbH, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled on the right to deduct input VAT in such a transactional structure.

In this article we present the CJEU’s perspective on this issue.