When adopting a supplier management model, companies look for the most efficient ways to optimise relationships with their suppliers, make their supply chains more efficient and cut their costs to continue receiving the best goods and services within the most appropriate time frames.
Proposals for amending the Taxes and Duties Act were released for a public consultation over the period from 21 August to 4 September 2024. Expected to come into force on 1 January 2025, the proposals caused a wide public resonance. They aim to improve tax compliance by restricting the circulation of hard cash and to encourage contactless payments. This article explores what we see as key changes.
As you may know, approval of the national medium-term tax policy guidelines, which was supposed to take place by 1 April 2024, has been delayed considerably. It’s not known for sure yet whether and how this will affect VAT treatment in future. However, the Ministry of Finance has drafted proposals for amending the VAT Act, aimed at passing the EU directive to ease the administrative burden on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and to improve the rules for applying 0% VAT and the margin scheme for second-hand goods, works of art, antiques and collectors’ items. The amendments are to come into force on 1 January 2025. This article explores what we see as key changes.
Estonia has drawn up new taxation plans that will considerably change the financial landscape for businesses and people from 2025. This article looks at the proposed defence tax and motor vehicle tax, as well as other significant tax increases affecting various sectors.
Much of the acquisition cost in a share deal tends to be financed externally, i.e. by borrowing. Repayment of a shareholder’s loan is typically exempt from corporate income tax (CIT) under Latvian law (more details in our article CIT reform: lending to related parties). Also, if interest paid on the shareholder’s loan complies with Latvian thin capitalisation rules and transfer pricing rules and is used for business purposes, i.e. it qualifies as a business expense, the interest charges are exempt from Latvian CIT.
The end of the summer saw the Supreme Court rule on cases concerning the tax treatment of income from various entertainment services. Just like income from live streaming of video games, winnings from participation in games of chance are high on the agenda when it comes to interpreting the relevant tax rules, which is causing disputes with the tax authority. One of these disputes involved the State Revenue Service (SRS) deciding to charge personal income tax (PIT) and late fees on an individual’s unreported winnings from a company organising games of chance. The taxpayer sued the tax authority, and his appeal eventually landed in the Supreme Court. This article continues our MindLink series on Supreme Court rulings concerning the tax treatment of income from recreational activities and looks at a recent Supreme Court ruling.
Since the current Latvian transfer pricing (TP) rules came into force back in 2018, companies are used to preparing and submitting a TP file in the second half of the current year. For most taxpayers, the financial year is the calendar year, which in conjunction with the TP rules means a TP file for the previous financial year must be submitted by 31 December of the current year.
Last week we wrote about proposals for amending the Taxes and Duties Act and looked at the proposed changes in taxation and administration. This article continues exploring changes expected to tidy up administrative and data sharing processes.
In many companies summer is the time when staff performance is being appraised, potentially leading to promotions and bonus payments. Yet the employer has discretion in paying bonuses – it’s not an obligation but a choice. There are several preconditions to consider when it comes to setting up and running a bonus system. The case law says a bonus shows appreciation for an employee’s good work, so it’s up to the employer to determine the amount of a bonus. However, this decision-making power should not be interpreted as the employer’s unilateral opportunity to pay bonuses inconsistently and with no legal justification.
The State Revenue Service (SRS) has drawn up a plan for dealing with situations where individuals have not reported their income in full. This year the SRS has identified about 70,000 individuals with a difference of at least EUR 20,000 between their bank account turnover and reported income. In September the SRS plans to send out notices asking those individuals to revise their income and report it in full. Sending such letters is not a new practice – the SRS has used them for several years to check that a person reports all taxable and non-taxable transactions. A letter arrives through the SRS’s electronic reporting system. The SRS has 30 days to wait for a response from the person giving reasons for the discrepancy or adjusting their annual tax return if they find the discrepancies between the bank account turnover and the tax return arise from unreported income.
If we are to successfully integrate artificial intelligence (AI) in society, first of all we need to cross our moral threshold. We can see a common attitude that “the technology is not ready, it’s not capable of doing what I need”. However, we often expect AI to act independently like a human. The technology can do a lot of things, yet we need to find out if we are able to see its added value. The computer does what we tell it to do, rather than what we want it to do.
In early June, the Finance Ministry proposed amending the Taxes and Duties Act to improve the general tax administration rules and held a public consultation on the proposed changes. The proposals have been approved by the Cabinet of Ministers and are being prepared for submission to Parliament. This article explores what we see as key changes.
