The payment of stamp duty is an unavoidable part of the process, if not a mandatory prerequisite for the initiation of proceedings. The amount of the duties is regulated by the Civil Procedure Law (hereinafter – “CPL”) and depends on the amount of the claim. Often, the amount of stamp duty has deterred potential claimants from filing a lawsuit. In addition, legal entities were previously not allowed to apply to the court for a reduction or deferral of the payment of stamp duty, which meant, for example, that a company in financial difficulties could not adequately defend its rights in court.
The amendments, which came into force on 1 April 2025, were aimed at implementing several rulings of the Constitutional Court. They mainly concern the calculation and determination of stamp duties and grant private legal entities the right to apply for exemption from court costs and bail and deferral of court cost payments. This article focuses more on the changes related to the determination and payment of stamp duties. These changes have significantly changed and clarified both the amount of the fees and the calculation procedure. Almost nothing remains of the previous provisions on the amount of fees and the calculation procedure, which were contained in section 34 of the previous CPL.
The CPL states that the court costs consist of the stamp duty and the costs of examining the case. The costs associated with the handling of the case include the preparation, service and issue of summonses, reminders and other court documents, as well as the return of written evidence. Previously, the courts had to calculate these costs separately before preparing a decision and there were cases where the debtor did not pay them on time. This placed an additional burden on the courts, as the state was obliged to initiate enforcement measures in such cases. Currently, these costs are included in the stamp duty, which allows the state to save money, as previously the collection of such debts often resulted in losses for the state. Furthermore, by combining stamp duty with case-related costs, the payment process for court costs is simplified.
As regards the amount of stamp duty itself, it should be noted that the minimum amount of stamp duty is now EUR 80 for pecuniary claims not exceeding EUR 1,000, — which is EUR 10 more than under the previous regime. The biggest differences can be observed for claims with significantly higher amounts. However, it should be noted that the new regulation has made the determination of the stamp duty amount incomparably easier, as a specific fee amount is now set within claim value brackets. In comparison, the previous regulation set specific brackets and percentages depending on the amount of the claim, which was less transparent and increased the risk of calculation errors.
Until now, there was no maximum limit for stamp duty, but the new regulation sets a “cap” of EUR 25,000. The changes also provide for the possibility of applying for a reduction in stamp duty for claims that do not exceed EUR 7,500, making the courts more accessible to a greater number of residents.
Example:
The new wording may cause some uncertainty about how court expenses are calculated in cases involving multiple claims. In such cases, the calculation procedure remains unchanged — multiple interrelated claims can be combined into a single claim, and the stamp duty must be paid based on the total claim amount specified in Annex 3 of the CPL, just as it was before the amendments.
Therefore, if the claim amount does not exceed EUR 7,500, the stamp duty will be lower; however, if the claim amount is at least EUR 40,001, the stamp duty will be higher than before.
The changes will also affect non-monetary claims. Until now, the stamp duty for such claims was set at EUR 70; after the amendments enter into force, it will be EUR 300. At the same time, it should be noted that previously in such cases the stamp duty and the costs of examining the case had to be paid separately, so the actual increase in costs is not as great as it may seem at first glance. It should also be borne in mind that these types of claims, for example in relation to intellectual property, are quite complex, so the costs associated with dealing with such cases tend to be higher.
Overall, the changes are aimed at solving previously existing problems and make the Civil Procedure Law clearer and easier to understand. To determine the potential amount of stamp duty, one currently only needs to open Annex 3 of the CPL, which contains a table with the thresholds for the amount of the claim.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionIn commercial transactions, there may be cases when a buyer, upon discovering defects in the purchased goods, wishes to cancel the contract or claim damages. However, not every defect identified by the buyer is necessarily considered a legitimate defect. Furthermore, it must be noted that the buyer (the business) is required to take certain actions in order to retain the right to compensation for damages or contract cancellation when defects in the goods are properly identified. This article casts more light on this.
This judgement of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) dealt with an important issue relating to the free movement of capital within the European Union. The case concerned a Polish law that restricts the tax exemption for internally managed collective investment undertakings (CIUs) from other EU countries to those managed by external entities. The said tax exemption was denied for CIUs that are managed internally. This restriction was contested as incompatible with EU law, in particular with the free movement of capital.
In the cases specified in the Commercial Law, a minority shareholder has the right to file a lawsuit in court against the founders, the board or council members, or an auditor in order to protect the company and its interests.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.