On 31 October 2024 Parliament passed the State Revenue Service (SRS) Act and the Tax and Customs Police Act (the ‘Police Act’) in their final reading to separate the Internal Security Board and the Tax and Customs Police Board from the SRS. These legislative changes will carry out the Ministry of Finance’s (MOF) intention of reorganising the SRS to carve out investigatory and operational functions. The new legal framework will result in the SRS being only tasked with the provision of advice, support and services in the field of tax and customs.

In early 2024 the State Revenue Service (SRS) published an advance tax ruling issued to a foreign company’s permanent establishment (PE) in Latvia, in which the SRS assessed the PE’s relationship with its foreign head office and explained whether the PE is liable to prepare and submit a transfer pricing (TP) file for their mutual transactions. In this article we outline what the tax ruling says about PE status, examine Latvian TP rules on documenting relationships and TP, and offer a theoretical example to explain the PE’s obligation to document TP in practice.

Proposals for amending the Taxes and Duties Act were released for a public consultation over the period from 21 August to 4 September 2024. Expected to come into force on 1 January 2025, the proposals caused a wide public resonance. They aim to improve tax compliance by restricting the circulation of hard cash and to encourage contactless payments. This article explores what we see as key changes.

Since the current Latvian transfer pricing (TP) rules came into force back in 2018, companies are used to preparing and submitting a TP file in the second half of the current year. For most taxpayers, the financial year is the calendar year, which in conjunction with the TP rules means a TP file for the previous financial year must be submitted by 31 December of the current year.

Last week we wrote about proposals for amending the Taxes and Duties Act and looked at the proposed changes in taxation and administration. This article continues exploring changes expected to tidy up administrative and data sharing processes.

In early June, the Finance Ministry proposed amending the Taxes and Duties Act to improve the general tax administration rules and held a public consultation on the proposed changes. The proposals have been approved by the Cabinet of Ministers and are being prepared for submission to Parliament. This article explores what we see as key changes.

Many taxpayers that have wrongly paid some taxes into the single tax account, made an overpayment or adjusted their liabilities will see an amount under ‘Unallocated Payments’ in the Electronic Declaration System. We asked the State Revenue Service (SRS) when such unallocated amounts expire.

In late 2023 the Ministry of Finance (MOF) drew up an informational report on plans to improve the operations of the State Revenue Service (SRS). The report suggested appropriate measures, including changes to the SRS organisational structure and revising the types of subordination. The guidelines and the goal of the reform are consistent with the SRS long-term strategy, which provides for improving its operations to become a more efficient tax and customs authority with the emphasis on encouraging cooperation with taxpayers.

The Taxes and Duties Act is among the pieces of legislation that have been amended the most in recent months. A number of important changes have been made to reviews facing taxpayers and ways of settling disagreements with the State Revenue Service (SRS).

In June 2023, Parliament passed two extensive amendments to the Taxes and Duties Act effective from 1 January 2024. This was followed by a publication on the website of the State Revenue Service (SRS) detailing the new system’s objectives and explaining the meaning of taxpayer grades.

Several sections of the Taxes and Duties Act define a taxpayer’s obligations. Section 15.2 requires the taxpayer to prepare a local transfer pricing (TP) file within 12 months after the end of the financial period and, depending on the circumstances, to submit it to the State Revenue Service (SRS) for the financial period:

Situation 1 – within 12 months after the end of the financial period; or
Situation 2 – within one month after receiving a request from the SRS.

This article is meant just for you if you are interested in learning more about a crucial relief in Situation 2. The taxpayer has the right to revise his local TP file every three years if he satisfies a certain condition and meets one annual requirement.

Amendments to the Taxes and Duties Act that require taxpayers to prepare and file a specified form of transfer pricing (TP) documentation with the State Revenue Service (SRS) took effect back in 2018, yet we had not seen any active enforcement steps from the SRS until the end of this summer, when several Latvian companies received an informational report on the submission of TP documentation via the SRS’s e-filing system (“EDS”). These reports imply that the SRS is checking the companies’ obligation to file TP documentation for 2020 and urging them to do so by the deadline stated in the report or to explain why they should not file TP documentation. This article reminds you of the TP documentation preparation and filing requirements and of the SRS’s activities in enforcing them, and we also suggest steps your company might take after receiving such a report.

This article explores recent amendments to the Taxes and Duties Act that allow qualifying taxpayers to extend the time limit for paying an overdue tax liability for a total of five years.

We have written before about a taxpayer’s duty to file with the State Revenue Service (SRS) a multinational enterprise group’s country-by-country (CbC) report under section 15(9) of the Taxes and Duties Act or a statement of the reporting company and its tax residence. This article explores how to correctly disclose information in the statement in the case of a non-standard fiscal period.

Our experience suggests that taxpayers carrying out the obligation to submit transfer pricing (TP) documentation to the State Revenue Service (SRS) may suddenly find themselves in an awkward situation, as the functionality of the Electronic Declaration System (EDS) prevents them from uploading a screenshot file that supports their benchmarking study because of its size. So the document fails to reach the SRS and puts the taxpayer at risk of defaulting on statutory requirements for information to be included in TP documentation. This article offers a solution to this problem.