Amendments to the Taxes and Duties Act that require taxpayers to prepare and file a specified form of transfer pricing (TP) documentation with the State Revenue Service (SRS) took effect back in 2018, yet we had not seen any active enforcement steps from the SRS until the end of this summer, when several Latvian companies received an informational report on the submission of TP documentation via the SRS’s e-filing system (“EDS”). These reports imply that the SRS is checking the companies’ obligation to file TP documentation for 2020 and urging them to do so by the deadline stated in the report or to explain why they should not file TP documentation. This article reminds you of the TP documentation preparation and filing requirements and of the SRS’s activities in enforcing them, and we also suggest steps your company might take after receiving such a report.
Under section 15.2 of the Taxes and Duties Act, Latvian-registered companies and permanent establishments that perform transactions (1) with related foreign companies, (2) with related individuals and (3) with persons based in tax havens, if those transactions total over EUR 5 million in the financial year, are required to prepare and file a specified form of TP documentation via EDS within 12 months after the end of the financial year. The form and content of TP documentation are detailed in the Taxes and Duties Act and in the Cabinet of Ministers’ Rule No. 802, Transfer pricing documentation and how the taxpayer and the tax authority may enter into an advance agreement on determining an arm’s length price (value) for a transaction or type of transaction.
It’s important to note that the Taxes and Duties Act prescribes penalties for failure to file your TP documentation on time or for a substantial breach of preparation requirements. The SRS has the power to charge a penalty of up to 1% of your controlled transaction but not to exceed EUR 100,000 per transaction.
To check how taxpayers meet the requirements for preparing and filing TP documentation, the SRS needs information on the amount of controlled transactions with certain business partners, which we have listed before.
The SRS’s access to this information was quite limited because from the corporate income tax (CIT) reform in 2018 through 2021 the CIT return had only one informational line 6.5.1, which had to show the amount of transactions with related persons (including residents) for the financial year, which does not count towards determining the TP documentation filing requirement.
This is the likely reason why from 1 December 2021 line 6.5.1 on the CIT return has been renamed “The total value of transactions with related non-resident persons during the financial year” and there is a new line 6.5.2 "The total value of transactions with related resident persons during the financial year". So line 6.5.1 should now show the amount of controlled transactions excluding transactions with residents, which the SRS and the taxpayer can use to determine whether TP documentation has to be prepared and filed.
Receiving an informational report means that the SRS has checked whether the company has filed TP documentation in past years, as an additional source of information on its obligation to file TP documentation for 2020. Thus, if your company has filed TP documentation for 2018 and/or 2019 but not for 2020, then you could also receive such a report from the SRS asking you to check that the requirements for filing TP documentation for 2020 are satisfied.
As stated above, the SRS has limited access to information on company transactions with related resident/non-resident persons, and the SRS often merely assumes a taxpayer may be liable to file TP documentation.
So, if your company receives such an informational report but you were not liable to file TP documentation according to your own information, then you should provide the SRS with a suitable explanation. If you find that your company has missed the filing deadline, you should try to file it by the deadline stated in the report.
However, if you are unable to meet the new filing deadline for various reasons, then it’s advisable to provide the SRS with an objective explanation of your reasons and to state your expected filing date.
As stated above, the rules effective from 28 November 2018, subject to meeting certain conditions, require a taxpayer to file TP documentation via the EDS kiosk within 12 months after the end of the financial year. Unfortunately the rules do not permit the SRS to extend the statutory filing deadline, so missing it poses a risk that the SRS will exercise its power to charge a penalty for failure to file TP documentation on time.
We are aware that on receiving a taxpayer’s statement explaining why he missed the filing deadline and stating the expected filing date, the SRS often replies that “if the taxpayer’s TP documentation is not filed or is filed after the statutory deadline, he faces a penalty of up to 1% of his controlled transaction”.
This answer implies that even if your company files TP documentation after the statutory deadline, you still risk receiving the SRS’s decision to charge a penalty.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionOur experience suggests that the State Revenue Service (SRS) has recently focused on checking how Latvian corporate taxpayers fulfil their obligation under transfer pricing (TP) legislation, i.e. (1) whether they have prepared TP documentation in the prescribed form by the statutory deadline and (2) whether their documentation gives all the required information to verify that their controlled transactions are arm’s length.
With the financial year nearing its end, section 15.2 of the Taxes and Duties Act requires many companies to prepare, or to prepare and file with the State Revenue Service (SRS), their transfer pricing (TP) documentation. Since determining related-party status often confuses taxpayers and authorities, this article reminds you who is considered a related party for TP purposes and what transactions require the taxpayer to prepare TP documentation.
In statutory cases, the taxpayer is liable to prepare transfer pricing (TP) documentation and file it with the State Revenue Service (SRS). An examination of TP documentation helps the SRS monitor the correctness of corporate income tax (CIT) payments because the difference between a controlled transaction’s value and market price must be included in the taxable base under the CIT Act. If the taxpayer defaults on the obligation to prepare and file TP documentation, then in addition to the opportunity to start an audit and assess the correctness of the CIT calculation, the SRS may start a data assesment in the field of tax revenue risks and charge a hefty fine on the company if an offence is found. This article explores what offences relating to TP documentation permit the taxpayer to be fined outside an audit and how the SRS should evaluate and justify the size of fine.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.