In recent years, intersectionality has become a hot topic in various fields, from political science to the provision of social services. The concept is also increasingly mentioned in public procurement processes to emphasise the need for comprehensive solutions that foster a more inclusive and equitable society. Intersectionality is a new and innovative look at how different identities such as gender, age, nationality, ethnicity, physical and cognitive ability affect people’s experiences and opportunities. This approach helps us to understand that socio-economic challenges affect different population groups differently and how they impact people's personal and working lives, including the management of organisations.

Given the current challenges facing Europe—ranging from increasing geopolitical tensions and slowing economic growth to intensified global technology competition—the European Commission (EC) has concluded that the European Union (EU) requires a comprehensive business plan that integrates climate action, circularity, and competitiveness.

On 26 February 2025, the EC presented the Clean Industrial Deal (CID), a strategic plan designed to accelerate decarbonisation, re-industrialisation, and innovation while enhancing the competitiveness of EU industries. The CID aims to strike a balance between the EU's global competitiveness and its ambitious environmental goals outlined in the Green Deal.

On 17 October 2024, the Sustainability Disclosure Act (“ŠDA” or “Law”) came into force, which sets out the framework for sustainability reporting and adopts the provisions of the European Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”). The law aims to provide publicly available and comparable information on the impact of the activities of legal entities on sustainability aspects, including environmental protection, social rights, human rights and aspects of corporate governance, including anti-corruption and anti-bribery, as well as information on how these issues affect the development, performance and condition of legal entities. This information should be included in the sustainability report.

We have previously informed our readers about the impact of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (“CBAM”) on companies importing goods (one of the most recent articles for Mindlink subscribers is available here). In short, from October 2023, companies (and economic operators) based in the European Union are subject to reporting requirements on the embedded emissions of goods imported from third countries that fall within the scope of the CBAM. Conversely, under the CBAM framework, as of next year, only companies that have obtained the status of registered CBAM reporters will be allowed to continue importing these goods.

Recognising that compliance with the CBAM requirements may create additional administrative and financial burdens, the European Commission (EC) has prepared a draft amendment to Regulation 2023/956 establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism providing for amendments to the existing regulatory framework and allowing for an exemption from the regulatory requirements for most importers.

Outsourced accounting has long been a strategic choice for companies looking to optimise their processes, cut costs and get professional financial support. As we enter 2025 and look to the future, the accounting industry is undergoing major changes driven by technological advances, changing customer demands and global trends. Let's take a look at the key directions that are shaping the future of outsourced accounting.

In previous MindLink articles, we looked at what the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is, which companies it applies to and how it is implemented in Latvia. In this article, we would like to draw readers' attention to important measures that companies should take in 2025 to continue importing CBAM goods to Latvia. We also explain why it is important to include high-quality data in CBAM reports.

Tax transparency is becoming increasingly important in the context of corporate sustainability. Investors, consumers and other stakeholders are paying increasing attention to how companies manage their tax liabilities and reflected in sustainability reports. We previously informed our readers about  PwC’s 2023 study “Tax Transparency and Sustainability Reporting in 2023” in this field. This year, PwC published a new study covering the sustainability review practices of over 850 companies in 21 countries. This article summarises the key findings of PwC’s 2024 global study “Global Tax Transparency and Tax Sustainability Reporting Study”.

When adopting a supplier management model, companies look for the most efficient ways to optimise relationships with their suppliers, make their supply chains more efficient and cut their costs to continue receiving the best goods and services within the most appropriate time frames.

In a previous article, we used a tax gap example to explain why taxation is a key pillar of ESG. Tax transparency and tax governance in the context of ESG are relevant topics in the PwC network – last year PwC published a study ‘Tax transparency and sustainability reporting in 2023’. The study looks at the sustainability reports of 269 listed companies (Australia, Brazil, Germany, Ireland, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland and the UK), i.e. whether their reports address tax aspects and how. The study examined what sustainability frameworks (i.e. documents and guidelines) companies use the most often to disclose tax aspects in their sustainability reports. In this article we have summarised information from the study to explain what tax details should be included in a sustainability report.

Sustainability has become a salient feature in today’s business landscape, with companies having to adapt to the growing pressure for operating responsibly and transparently. The European Union (EU) has taken significant steps to improve corporate sustainability reporting standards by implementing the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). It lays down a wider range of reporting requirements and offers more detailed guidelines helping companies make accurate and complete disclosures on their ESG impacts, as well as outlining criteria for companies liable to report on their sustainability practices.

ESG or sustainability is a hot topic that people initially associated with the environment and climate change. The social and governance components of ESG have recently become even more relevant when it comes to workers, supply chains or tax management. This article briefly looks at why we should be treating taxes as a key component of sustainability.

In today’s rapidly changing world, organisations need to be proactive to stay competitive and they also need to regularly assess potential business risks and opportunities. When it comes to assessing risks and opportunities, businesses often opt for enterprise risk management – the culture, capabilities and practices an organisation integrates with setting a strategy and applies when it carries out that strategy, with the purpose of managing risk in creating, preserving and realising value.

Whistleblowing is not a novel concept in the European Union (EU) so it’s not related to sustainability alone. However, the latest sustainability legislation enhances the significance of whistleblowing and the need to protect whistleblowers. This article explores how a whistleblowing system can drive sustainable growth in organisations.

The Green Deal aims to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent. We have undertaken to reduce our greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 55% (compared to the 1990 levels) by 2030 and achieve climate neutrality by 2050. To meet these targets and mitigate the impact on climate change, countries and businesses need to cut down their GHG emissions significantly.

European Sustainability Reporting Standards (EU) 2023/2772 (‘ESRS’) require companies to disclose information on their energy consumption and structure. This article explores the disclosure requirement and why you should view it through the prism of opportunities.