In late 2023 PwC conducted its 27th global CEO survey with 4,702 respondents from 105 countries. The survey suggests that CEOs feel increasingly under pressure to adapt and change their current economic activity so that their company remains viable in the long term. They mention technological advances, consumer behaviours, regulatory dynamics and climate change as key factors. From a sustainability perspective, most CEOs view decarbonising their companies or reducing greenhouse gases (GHG) as a priority, which can be achieved mainly by taking steps to improve energy efficiency and developing eco-friendly goods and services.
In January 2024 the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) launched its public consultation on two exposure drafts for sustainability reporting standards for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). One standard is for listed SMEs and the other, a voluntary reporting standard, is for other unlisted SMEs.
Terms such as sustainability, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) are increasingly mentioned in public debates and corporate meetings. The more conscientious companies are not only well-versed in sustainability matters but they have set up a corporate structure that will help them report more efficiently on their sustainability performance. Other companies are still looking for a sustainability expert to help them deal with their sustainability obligations. But can hiring a sustainability expert solve all the problems? And what is the board’s role and responsibility for sustainability performance? Read on to find out.
To get ready for implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), in this article we are looking for the answers to why an external review of sustainability reports is necessary, what review procedures are expected, and how we can prepare ourselves for this change.
Many people see the high cost of living as a challenge that forces the public and the government to take steps in order to obtain protection from today’s unpredictable economic conditions. While every worker deserves to receive a wage that allows them to satisfy their needs and live a decent life, the UN recognises that more than a third of workers globally earn less than they need to secure such a standard of living. The problem remains unsolved in 2023, so this article summarises the various challenges that companies need to overcome if they are to implement what is known as a living wage.
The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) require organisations governed by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive to carry out a dual materiality assessment aimed at identifying environmental, social and governance (ESG) areas that are material to them. Unlike the previous practice, which had these areas identified according to the impact made by an organisation, the new methodology adds a further level of analysis assessing the financial impact ESG areas have on the organisation in terms of risks and opportunities.
Today a lot of attention is being paid to protecting wildlife and improving the environment. Natural resource tax (NRT) is one of the instruments that helps protect the environment. The Cabinet of Ministers has approved and passed to Parliament for review a set of proposals for amending the NRT Act aimed at promoting economical and efficient use of natural resources and limiting environmental pollution. According to available information, some of the amendments are to come into force on 1 January and the rest on 1 July 2024. We informed our MindLink.lv subscribers about some of the proposals on 5 May 2023. This article explores how the NRT Act is to change.
To embed sustainability aspects in its core business, an organisation should be aware of effects it has on the environment and on its stakeholders, as well as how the environment and stakeholders affect its business. Embedding sustainability aspects in business is a process that encourages the organisation to revise its business model and overall strategy, as well as gathering and analysing data for use in decision-making to identify and mitigate risks affecting it. This article offers a brief overview of the sustainability or ESG framework, focusing on “G” for governance. We are zooming in on tax governance as a sustainability aspect that we encourage organisations to embed in their core business.
There is much talk of various sustainability aspects within and outside the European Green Deal. Sustainability has become a daily routine in the more conscientious companies, as they devise sustainability strategies and report on sustainability goals they have achieved. There are also some companies that seek to exploit this situation by advertising themselves as well as their products and services as green, environmentally friendly or sustainable, because this may give them advantages on the market. This approach is not always seen as honest, and it can mislead consumers or even affect competition.
Following the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, aka the Paris Agreement, the European Parliament signed the resolution on the European Green Deal on 15 January 2020 and urged the member states to carry out the required transition to a climate-neutral society by 2050 at the latest. The Green Deal involves making a variety of important changes. One of such changes is Regulation (EU) 2023/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 April 2023 amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards strengthening the CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles in line with the Union’s increased climate ambition. What this Regulation provides for is nothing new in substance, as CO2 emission requirements for vehicles have been adopted earlier, but it does introduce some fairly ambitious goals. This article explores some of its requirements.
The rise of sustainability, a dynamic and fast-growing part of business, is significantly driven by EU climate and social goals and the subsequent legislation. This legislation mainly lays down requirements for disclosing information on a company’s key sustainability impact areas and relevant performance. However, these requirements are gradually expanding beyond the company’s direct impacts.
The European Sustainability Reporting Standards, which we had been awaiting since the adoption of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, were approved in late July. The directive aims to provide transparent publicly available information on social and environmental risks facing companies, on new opportunities, on what activities companies are already doing, and on their future goals and ESG results achieved so far. Details of which companies are subject to the directive’s requirements can be found here.
Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) came into force on 17 May 2023. This so-called “carbon tax” applies from October 2023, with companies subject to CBAM being liable to file their first CBAM reports in January 2024. Carbon emission certificates will have to be purchased from 2026. In this article we are explaining in detail which companies are subject to CBAM.
One EU individual on average discards 11 kg of textiles a year. Globally, a consignment of textiles is buried or incinerated every second. The global production of textiles almost doubled over the period from 2000 to 2015. Clothing and footwear consumption is expected to grow by 63% by 2030. In this article we’ll be looking at some of the EU’s proposed measures to address the problem of textile waste, as well as discussing what’s being done in Latvia and what we can expect in taxation.
