Sustainability has become a salient feature in today’s business landscape, with companies having to adapt to the growing pressure for operating responsibly and transparently. The European Union (EU) has taken significant steps to improve corporate sustainability reporting standards by implementing the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). It lays down a wider range of reporting requirements and offers more detailed guidelines helping companies make accurate and complete disclosures on their ESG impacts, as well as outlining criteria for companies liable to report on their sustainability practices.
CSRD affects about 50,000 companies across the EU and is being implemented in several stages. For many of the companies governed by CSRD, the sustainability reporting requirement has come into force this year, meaning the first report is due for FY24.
To assess whether companies are ready to report as the deadline approaches and to identify key challenges and opportunities arising from the new reporting requirements, PwC surveyed 547 respondents – executives as well as senior finance, risk and sustainability professionals – across more than 30 countries and territories (PwC’s Global CSRD Survey 2024).
Almost two-thirds (63%) of companies say they are very or extremely confident they will be ready to report under CSRD. More than three-quarters (79%) of companies headquartered outside the EU and 74% of those headquartered within the EU believe CSRD has resulted or will result in business leaders considering sustainability in their decision making to a greater extent.
While the survey indicates confidence in sustainability reporting, respondents cite obstacles to implementation. The single biggest concern listed is data availability and quality (59%).
Only one-fifth of companies due to report in FY25 have validated the availability and completeness of data for their disclosures. Less than 60% of all respondents have engaged their technology function, although most respondents plan to do so, and most companies are not using specialist tools or technology to obtain sustainability data. Spreadsheets are the most commonly used tool (74%), compared with 26% using centralised sustainability data storage (e.g. a data lake) and 20% using AI, although more have plans to use these tools in the future.
It’s good to see companies being largely confident they will be ready to report. Yet there is still some way to go, with the majority grappling with complex challenges, particularly the quantity and quality of data required, not only for their own operations but across their value chain. Business leaders recognise that sustainability information must be available, accurate and audit-ready: not just on a one-time basis, but annually. Implementing CSRD means we can rely on a global baseline of reporting standards to improve comparability and offer insights into corporate sustainability performance.
Despite high confidence levels, especially in companies due to report in FY25 (72%), less than half have completed early-stage activities, such as confirmation of reporting options (39%), double materiality assessment (38%) and validation of data availability (20%).
While respondents report high confidence on topics that are generally included in existing disclosures such as workforce (75%), business conduct (75%) and climate change (60%), they are far less confident in their ability to meet reporting requirements on less familiar topics such as biodiversity (35%), pollution (43%) and workers in the value chain (44%).
The survey finds 76% believe CSRD has resulted or will result in business leaders considering sustainability in their decision making, including 59% who say sustainability is already being considered to a greater extent due to CSRD, and 17% who say it will be considered.
Companies expect a wide range of business benefits to flow from CSRD. More than half (51%) expect benefits to a large or very large extent to include better environmental performance, 49% expect improved engagement with stakeholders, and 48% better risk mitigation.
Almost one-third believe CSRD largely improves revenue growth (28%) or cost savings (26%). The expectation of financial benefits is higher in companies closer to their reporting deadline, with 38% of companies due to report in FY25 expecting to benefit largely through revenue growth and 34% through cost savings.
In April–May 2024, PwC surveyed 547 executives and senior professionals across more than 30 countries and territories. Sixty percent of the companies are headquartered in the EU. More than half had annual revenues of over $1bn. The sectors included: Manufacturing (25%); Financial Services (21%); Technology, Media & Telecommunications (18%); Consumer & Retail (14%); Energy, Utilities & Resources (13%); Healthcare (7%). Across all respondents, 57% say they will be filing for the first time in FY25, based on the data for 2024.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionESG or sustainability is a hot topic that people initially associated with the environment and climate change. The social and governance components of ESG have recently become even more relevant when it comes to workers, supply chains or tax management. This article briefly looks at why we should be treating taxes as a key component of sustainability.
In today’s rapidly changing world, organisations need to be proactive to stay competitive and they also need to regularly assess potential business risks and opportunities. When it comes to assessing risks and opportunities, businesses often opt for enterprise risk management – the culture, capabilities and practices an organisation integrates with setting a strategy and applies when it carries out that strategy, with the purpose of managing risk in creating, preserving and realising value.
Whistleblowing is not a novel concept in the European Union (EU) so it’s not related to sustainability alone. However, the latest sustainability legislation enhances the significance of whistleblowing and the need to protect whistleblowers. This article explores how a whistleblowing system can drive sustainable growth in organisations.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.