In early July 2024, the European Commission (EC) published its annual report on tax policies across the EU. Value added tax (VAT) is one of the most important taxes in the EU accounting for about 7.5% of GDP and 18.6% of total EU tax revenue in 2022. This article explores the EC’s VAT findings.
Latvia is among the member states in which VAT revenue represents a significant percentage of total tax revenue. In 2022, Latvia’s VAT revenue stood at 31% (a 7% increase on 2013) – the second highest percentage in the EU and significantly higher than the EU average (18.6%), Lithuania (27%) and Estonia (28%). The lowest VAT revenue percentages were reported in Belgium (15%), Luxembourg (16%) and France (17%). This means the importance of VAT as a source of tax revenue varies from country to country.
The Latvian VAT rate of 21% is slightly lower than the EU average of 21.5%. In 2023 the highest rate was reported in Hungary (27%) and the lowest in Luxembourg (16%). Estonia has raised its standard rate of 20% to 22% this year and plans to bump it up to 24% in July 2025. Lithuania is considering raising its VAT rate of 21% to 22%.
To achieve its social, economic or environmental goals, Latvia applies reduced VAT rates on various goods and services, just like other member states. Reduced rates are important policy instruments, yet they cause a loss of VAT revenue and complicate tax administration. The EU VAT rate reform came into force in 2022. The member states can now apply no more than two reduced rates of at least 5% and within specified limits a reduced rate of below 5% (including an exemption with recovery). A reduced rate is only available on the goods and services listed in Annex III to the VAT directive. The reform takes account of Europe’s Green Deal by including it on the list of goods and services eligible for the reduced rate, such as solar panels, electrical bicycles and efficient low-emission heating systems (Latvia has not taken this option). The reduced rates will be phased out on fossil fuels (by 2030) and chemical pesticides (by 2032).
The EC estimates that the EU annual VAT revenue could rise 20% or by up to EUR 230 billion if reduced rates were not applied. The data for 2021 suggests that Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia were among the member states with the lowest loss of revenue due to reduced rates (3–4%). This means the Baltic States are applying reduced rates to a relatively small number of goods and services. The revenue lost because of reduced rates in countries such as Austria, Cyprus and Luxembourg is around 18%. This could be due to reduced rates being applied far more widely in these countries.
Failure to comply with VAT law causes a loss of VAT revenue known as a VAT gap. This is computed as the difference between the expected theoretical VAT revenue and the VAT actually collected. The VAT gap has various causes, including legal defects in legislation, tax evasion, fraud, administrative errors, and insolvency. The VAT gap caused by non-compliance with the law across the EU averaged 5.3% in 2021. The highest VAT gap is reported in Romania (36.7%), Malta (25.7%) and Greece (17.8%). The lowest VAT gap is reported in the Netherlands (–0.2%), Finland (0.4%), Spain (0.8%) and Estonia (1.4%). In Latvia, the VAT gap was 7.3% in 2021 (it was almost three times as high in 2012). Lithuania has the highest VAT gap of the Baltic States (14.5%).
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionIn this article, we will explore how the courts ruled on a tax audit where the State Revenue Service (SRS) claimed the company under audit had wrongly deducted input VAT and misapplied a ratio. Although the SRS did not approve the company’s adjustments to its VAT returns and did not refund the VAT it had overpaid, the courts found the penalty and interest charged by the SRS to be justified. This case highlights important lessons for companies to avoid similar problems in the future.
In its ruling C26128713, SKC-201/2019 of 28 June 2019, the Supreme Court took a different view on the VAT Act’s condition that the taxable amount should include only taxes payable in relation to a supply of services. The dispute involved a forced lease of land that stipulated a rent plus a compensation of real estate tax (RET). The Supreme Court was assessing whether VAT should be charged on the compensation. First of all, the assessment focused on what items attract RET and who is liable to pay it.
In this article we explore Ruling C-606/22 from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the entitlement to a refund of value added tax (VAT) where the taxable person has applied a higher rate of VAT than what the law prescribes. This ruling is important because it explains how the VAT directive’s principles should be applied in practice where a cash-register receipt has been issued to the customer, which is practically impossible to amend in order to show the correct rate of VAT and to refund the overpaid tax to the customer.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.