Proposals for amending the Anti Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism and Proliferation Financing Act (AMLCTPFA) were laid before Parliament on 3 May 2024. These are being debated along with several other enactments governing crypto-asset service providers to harmonise the national law with the EU framework. In addition to several improvements related to crypto-asset service providers, the Finance Ministry has presented proposals for improving the general AMLCTPFA rules. This would help ease the administrative burden while staying true to AMLCTPFA’s objective. However, the legislative process is not yet finished and the current wording of the proposals might not receive Parliament’s approval in the last reading. This article explores some of the most significant improvements.

What are an external accountant’s obligations under the Anti Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism and Proliferation Financing (AML/CTPF) Act if accounting services are provided to related companies only? The Administrative Division of the Latvian Supreme Court referred this question to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on 4 January 2024.

Identifying the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) of a legal entity is key to securing compliance with the anti-money laundering (AML) rules and making sure that no business is done with sanctioned persons. Yet there are some other aspects to be considered because the rules vary as to how a UBO is defined in each particular case. This article explores how these differences can be detected and applied for daily purposes to ensure compliance with the AML rules and the sanctions rules.