Companies are currently working hard to prepare their financial statements for a statutory audit, so this is the right time to revise and update their basic business information. There is a general obligation often neglected by taxpayers because it seems insignificant: the State Revenue Service (SRS) must be duly notified of the taxpayer’s core economic activity according to the statistical classification of economic activities NACE 2.0, deployed uniformly across the EU. In this article we stress the importance of this obligation, remind you of the deadlines, make a few practical recommendations, and describe the proposed migration to NACE 2.1 designed to improve statistical comparability.
The EU internal market successfully uses statistical standards for gathering, transmitting and publishing data to ensure government agencies, financial institutions, companies and other internal-market participants can access reliable and comparable statistics. So it’s important for the taxpayer’s economic activity to be classified and interpreted uniformly across the EU.
In practice taxpayers tend to pursue several lines of business at the same time and generate revenue from each, yet no taxpayer can have more than one core economic activity. This is determined according to the revenue stream that represents the largest percentage in total revenue for the tax year. Taxpayers that have just started their business will determine their core economic activity according to their anticipated revenue figures. If the plan fails and another economic activity turns out to be more profitable, the taxpayer is permitted to adjust their core economic activity each year.
Notifying the SRS of the taxpayer’s core economic activity is not just another formality to comply with the law. Reporting the right NACE code has far-reaching practical implications:
Section 15(1)(15) of the Taxes and Duties Act requires taxpayers to provide the SRS Electronic Declaration System (EDS) by 1 May with information on their core economic activity in the previous tax year if it has changed and the information given earlier is no longer true. We emphasise that the declared core economic activity must show that the taxpayer belongs to a particular industry and line of business.
New companies have to file information within a month after registering their economic activity at the Enterprise Registry or the SRS. If their core economic activity changes, it can be replaced with another in the next tax year. The law does not mandate disclosure of additional economic activities and this information can be volunteered during the tax year without restriction.
To provide information, the appropriate NACE code should be selected from the relevant code classifier. The diversity of available codes can sometimes make it difficult to get to the right code, so we recommend moving step by step:
As you work with the classifier, you are advised to pay attention to certain features that will make it easier to determine the most appropriate core economic activity:
The core economic activity you have selected should be notified in the EDS section “Documents à From Form à Taxpayer Registration and Data Change Forms à Statement of Taxpayer’s Core Economic Activity”.
There are plans to migrate to NACE 2.1 on 1 January 2025. The new version is needed to reflect technological advances (e.g. there will be separate codes for companies that offer 3D printing and similar laser technology related solutions, cloud infrastructures and search engine services) and to incorporate changes in environmental policies (e.g. electricity producers will be further classified by type of energy source – renewable or non-renewable).
Changes will affect the classification of retailers. Retail in specialised shops is currently separated from retail over the internet. The difference between the two types of sales will be eliminated because retail services are often rendered simultaneously in shops and online and it’s difficult to accurately determine the proportion of retail in total transactions. This is why in future the primary criterion for classifying sales services will be the type of goods sold, not the sales channel. This means that physical goods will be organically separated from the ever-growing sales of digital products.
There are plans to set up a new class “Provision of logistics services” and define the place of fintech companies in the classification according to the principle of added value (financial intermediaries or digital technology service providers). The definition and classification of intermediary services will be revised to provide that these services can also be rendered digitally, and income may include other sources of profit, such as income from advertising.
For more details we encourage you to study the proposed structure of NACE 2.1 with explanatory notes on the Central Statistical Office’s website.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionThe European Central Bank (ECB) has been increasing its key interest rates since June 2022 to mitigate the high inflation caused by Covid-19. Taxpayers have good reason to debate whether they should revise the interest rates historically applied in their long-term financing transactions between related parties and apply new rates that are arm’s length and reflect the current economic conditions. This article explores the vision of the State Revenue Service (SRS) and recommendations for mitigating potential transfer pricing (TP) risks.
Setting an arm’s length fee for your intragroup services is one of the transfer pricing (TP) challenges you might face. In 2018 Latvia decided to offer relief for low value-adding services (LVAS) to facilitate this process for companies. If certain criteria are met, LVAS can be analysed under a simplified procedure, meaning the service provider can apply a 5% markup on costs without undertaking a detailed benchmarking study. This article serves to remind you of a key requirement when it comes to taking the simplified approach to LVAS.
We have written before about the profit split method (PSM) and its potential in transfer pricing (TP) analysis, looking at the essence of this method and the scope for using it. This article explores PSM’s advantages and disadvantages.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.