Taking care of employees’ mental health is not merely idle chatter or a formal work safety obligation. An employer that fails to pay attention to staff overload issues may face some real legal consequences. This article examines the legal implications of a worker being diagnosed with burnout syndrome and offers a practical overview of how the employer could respond.
In its 2018 survey the National Labour Office stated that burnout syndrome is a common health disorder caused by stress. Psychological hazards, such as time constraints, invariable pace of work, long working hours, and stress, are recognised as crucial workplace factors by occupational health and safety experts. This is also confirmed by recent surveys, with 43% of workers surveyed in 2023 experiencing signs of burnout.
Under paragraph 5.15 of the Cabinet of Ministers’ Rule No. 908, Procedures for Investigating and Recording Occupational Diseases, burnout syndrome is one of the occupational diseases caused by overload. This means that burnout syndrome should be addressed and remedied as seriously as any other injury at work. The occupational health and safety legislation applies, making the employer liable to eliminate occupational hazards.
If a worker has experienced signs of burnout syndrome in the workplace, the employer should expect to be asked to eliminate the working conditions and improve the processes that triggered the onset of burnout symptoms. The National Labour Office may, either on its own initiative1 or at the worker’s request, approach the employer about any workplace factors that pose or may pose a health hazard.
If the employer fails to eliminate such risks, then some of the legal consequences might be the worker terminating employment and applying to the National Labour Office, or even to the courts, for compensation under section 1635 of the Civil Code. The worker could also refuse to work,2 which is likely to result in idle time caused by the employer, entitling the worker to compensation.
It’s important to note that under section 19 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, if the employer fails to eliminate health hazards (according to the National Labour Office’s instructions) and the worker unilaterally terminates employment because of that, the employer is liable to pay compensation equal to the worker’s six-month average earnings. The employer may also be fined for breaching the occupational health and safety legislation.
If burnout syndrome is duly diagnosed as occupational disease, the employer is in fact unable to terminate employment with the worker. Although section 101(1)(11) of the Employment Act provides that the employer may terminate employment with a worker who fails to carry out work for more than six months because of temporary incapacity for work, section 109(4) makes a crucial exception: the employer cannot terminate employment if such incapacity for work is caused by occupational disease.
This leads to the conclusion that burnout cases expose the employer to a high legal risk. To take proper care of staff health and prevent burnout, and if necessary be able to put together suitable arguments to defend corporate interests in court, the employer should implement and document a set of measures, for example:
Interestingly, while working hours might at first seem to be a merely organisational matter, the aggregated hours scheme is also considered a psychological hazard. We need to emphasise the employer’s responsibility in the case of aggregated hours, because this poses a higher risk of the onset of burnout syndrome and the employer has a proportional obligation to provide an even wider range of activities in order to mitigate mental health risks.
In summary, from the standpoint of legal consequences, burnout syndrome is just another occupational disease. Given the increasing public awareness of the significance of mental health and how the working environment affects it, this subject is likely to become even more topical. Employers should focus on prevention, as well as adapting and improving their working conditions, since the legal obstacles to resolving situations caused by worker burnout are huge.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionWe have written before about changes to labour law affecting tax matters. Tax authorities are now scrutinising compliance with local and international law that provides for giving posted workers employment conditions that are consistent with the host country’s national law, including prescribed working hours, rest periods, protection at work and minimum pay. This article explores the rules governing pay and their tax implications.
On 18 April 2023 the Supreme Court ruled on case No. A420131521 concerning the classification of non-business expenses for corporate income tax (CIT) purposes, application of the concept of labour lease, and additional taxes charged by the State Revenue Service (SRS) in the construction sector, where subcontracted labour was used. By its ruling the Supreme Court refused the company’s request for reversal of the SRS’s decision, which remains unchanged and has taken effect. We feel MindLink subscribers should become familiar with this decision by which the SRS charged CIT and national social insurance (NSI) contributions, as well as a late fee and a penalty. For personal income tax (PIT) purposes, only a penalty was charged.
During the pandemic, Latvian companies faced unprecedented challenges around remote working, when the entire corporate culture came up for overhaul. The biggest challenges arose from the need for flexibility as the traditional eight-hour working day at the office was upgraded with the option to connect remotely at the employee’s convenience. Some companies cancelled the full-time office presence requirement altogether and set up alternative working arrangements with variable hours, places and conditions. Flexibility became a key aspect in keeping employees motivated and loyal. This article explores the rapid development of flexible reward schemes.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.