Launched by the State Revenue Service (SRS) in 2018, the taxpayer rating system started out with five dimensions of analysis to determine a taxpayer’s individual assessment in the tax authority’s eyes. After hearing suggestions from the business community in February 2020, the rating system (dubbed “tax speedometer”) was expanded to include another two analysis dimensions with five new business assessment indicators. This article explores the system’s objectives, taxpayer groups, key analysis dimensions and assessments, as well as the taxpayer’s benefits from being rated.
The SRS set three main objectives the taxpayer rating system was to achieve:
These objectives imply taxpayers are to receive a significant benefit from the rating system’s existence.
Given the system’s wide coverage, a rating is available to all entities, regardless of their tax payment regime, that have been on the register of taxpayers for at least six months in the categories below:
As stated above, the current system includes seven main analysis dimensions, including not only corporate tax compliance but also financial indicator categories, transparency and other dimensions:
To make the rating as objective as possible, some of the analysis dimensions include more than one indicator to be analysed, varying from 1 to 5. There are a total of 18 indicators across the dimensions, yet this number varies from taxpayer to taxpayer according to their line of business to ensure each taxpayer is assessed as objectively as possible. All of the system’s indicators and their descriptions can be found on the SRS website.
The SRS does not rule out the possibility of adding more indicators if necessary.
Analysing all these dimensions and indicators ends up in an overall assessment being issued to the taxpayer, available via the Electronic Declaration System. Here is the scoring:
Taxpayer ratings are updated monthly, which allows them to take prompt steps to improve their score if need be.
The rating system makes it sufficiently easy for the taxpayer to take a look at himself from the SRS’s point of view, which may help the taxpayer achieve his short-term and long-term business objectives.
The first benefit is the opportunity to compare the taxpayer’s business with other same-sector players in the area, region and country. Such an assessment allows the taxpayer to draw conclusions about his business’s efficiency and sustainability, provided the assessment is as objective as possible.
The second benefit is that the taxpayer can inform his potential customers and suppliers of his reputation, compliance discipline and business stability, supported by reliable data from the SRS. This may serve as an important basis for expanding his business.
Finally, we need to remember the importance of a relationship with the SRS that is based on mutual cooperation and honesty. A good rating will serve as the taxpayer’s business card in communicating with the SRS, which can definitely save time, a resource so valuable for companies. If the taxpayer runs into difficulties or, for instance, a whole sector experiences a crisis, then state aid will be a key factor directly linked with the SRS. Honesty and a good rating will then certainly benefit the taxpayer.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionOn 1 December 2021 the European Parliament published the approved directive on the preparation of a public country-by-country report (“PCbCR Directive”). It states that any multinational group with consolidated revenue exceeding EUR 750 million for each of the last two financial years has to publish certain information (including revenue, headcount, and taxes paid) on their operations in each EU member state and certain third countries. This information has to be posted on the group’s website by December 2026 relating to subjects governed by the Directive if the financial year ends on 31 December 2025.
We have written before about a taxpayer’s duty to file with the State Revenue Service (SRS) a multinational enterprise group’s country-by-country (CbC) report under section 15(9) of the Taxes and Duties Act or a statement of the reporting company and its tax residence. This article explores how to correctly disclose information in the statement in the case of a non-standard fiscal period.
Our experience suggests that taxpayers carrying out the obligation to submit transfer pricing (TP) documentation to the State Revenue Service (SRS) may suddenly find themselves in an awkward situation, as the functionality of the Electronic Declaration System (EDS) prevents them from uploading a screenshot file that supports their benchmarking study because of its size. So the document fails to reach the SRS and puts the taxpayer at risk of defaulting on statutory requirements for information to be included in TP documentation. This article offers a solution to this problem.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.