The autumn sees the State Revenue Service (SRS) sending requests to taxpayers for information on transactions making up their bank account turnover and discrepancies with the information available to the SRS. This article explores the process and practical communication with the SRS (more details in “Bank account turnover out of line with tax filings”).
The January 2018 amendments to the Taxes and Duties Act require the Latvian banks and service providers by 1 February each year to notify the SRS of the bank account turnover of any taxpayer whose total debit or credit turnover in their demand deposit and payment accounts for the previous year is EUR 15,000 or more, in order to encourage voluntary payment of taxes. In that case the bank will notify the SRS of the customer’s personal identity number, name and surname, as well as the debit and credit turnover and balances in all of the customer’s accounts. Recent practice suggests that the SRS may approach the person throughout the year and request information for multiple tax years at once.
This means that such requests relating to all the years that are open to audit may reach the person not only during the year of information exchange but in any period.
After receiving information on a person whose bank account turnover exceeds EUR 15,000, the SRS will compare the information obtained from the Latvian banks with details appearing on the person’s annual income tax return, or with the information available to the SRS if the person has not filed a tax return. The SRS's preliminary information on the person does not include an account statement or details of each transaction, so after making a comparison and finding a discrepancy, the SRS will send a letter to the person via the Electronic Declaration System, asking them to explain the origin of that discrepancy, report any unreported income, and evaluate the need to calculate and pay more tax. The SRS may send the person an information request for multiple tax years or for each one separately.
Discrepancies between the person's annual income tax return and bank account turnover may be due to various incoming payments that do not always need to be reported on the tax return and charged to personal income tax (PIT). Our experience suggests that credit turnover discrepancies with the tax return do not mean that the person has understated their annual income and underpaid PIT. Not having access to full bank account printouts, the SRS is initially unable to check whether the person has fulfilled their tax obligations.
A discrepancy between the annual income tax return and the SRS's information may have various reasons, for instance:
If the person has received a request from the SRS to explain the situation, the time limit may be extended up to 30 days at least. A longer extension requires a good reason. If the SRS approves an extension request, the parties will agree on a revised deadline.
When preparing an explanation of how the discrepancy arose, it is a good idea to look through the transactions and group them together in order to calculate total incoming payments for each group and explain what it is about (e.g. payments between own accounts or gifts from parents).
If this review finds any income that still needs reporting or charging PIT, the person should state this finding and notify the SRS of the time frame for correcting this mistake and paying tax if necessary. It is important to note that a late fee will be levied on any PIT calculated and paid to the government in this situation.
If the person does not receive any further questions from the SRS after providing the information requested, this usually means that the explanation has been accepted. The SRS will not issue a separate statement of acceptance.
If the person fails to give an explanation, the SRS has the power under the State Revenue Service Act to demand account statements from the banks in order to find out what caused the discrepancy. Noticing someone who has received income that goes unreported and/or with tax unpaid, the SRS may later approach the person and launch a thematic review or an audit.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionDraft rules that significantly change the system for reporting suspicious transactions were announced at the meeting of state secretaries on 14 January 2021. This article explores the current reporting requirements and the proposed changes relating to the new goAML app.
Last year the State Revenue Service (“SRS”) for the first time analysed data supplied by the Latvian banks to find income unreported by Latvian residents. Many taxpayers had a letter from the SRS asking them to explain why their bank income details do not match their tax filings. This article explores how the SRS runs taxpayer checks and what response is advisable.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.