The end of the summer saw the Supreme Court rule on cases concerning the tax treatment of income from various entertainment services. Just like income from live streaming of video games, winnings from participation in games of chance are high on the agenda when it comes to interpreting the relevant tax rules, which is causing disputes with the tax authority. One of these disputes involved the State Revenue Service (SRS) deciding to charge personal income tax (PIT) and late fees on an individual’s unreported winnings from a company organising games of chance. The taxpayer sued the tax authority, and his appeal eventually landed in the Supreme Court. This article continues our MindLink series on Supreme Court rulings concerning the tax treatment of income from recreational activities and looks at a recent Supreme Court ruling.

The State Revenue Service (SRS) has drawn up a plan for dealing with situations where individuals have not reported their income in full. This year the SRS has identified about 70,000 individuals with a difference of at least EUR 20,000 between their bank account turnover and reported income. In September the SRS plans to send out notices asking those individuals to review their income and report it in full. Sending such letters is not a new practice – the SRS has used them for several years to check that a person reports all taxable and non-taxable transactions. A letter arrives through the SRS’s electronic reporting system. The SRS has 30 days to wait for a response from the person giving reasons for the discrepancy or adjusting their annual tax return if they find the discrepancies between the bank account turnover and the tax return arise from unreported income.

In early July 2024, the European Commission (EC) published its annual report on tax policies across the EU. Value added tax (VAT) is one of the most important taxes in the EU accounting for about 7.5% of GDP and 18.6% of total EU tax revenue in 2022. This article explores the EC’s VAT findings.