Now that the concept of remote work has become an everyday occurrence, many companies are considering ways to adapt their online staff motivation and team-building events to the new conditions. This article explores the State Revenue Service’s opinion on staff sustainability events held within one department of an organisation and on catering expenses being included in staff sustainability event expenses (“SSEE”) if an event is held remotely.
Section 8(2)(7) of the Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Act states that non-business expenses are all expenses that are not directly related to the taxpayer’s business, including any representation expenses and SSEE for the financial year which together exceed 5% of the total gross employment pay calculated for employees in the previous financial year on which national social insurance contributions have been paid.
Under section 8(3) of the CIT Act, only representation expenses and SSEE up to the statutory limit may be excluded from the taxable base (SSEE must be recorded separately from other expenses).
It is important to note that within the meaning of the CIT Act, SSEE are expenses incurred in holding staff motivation or team-building events and other staff motivation expenses if those benefits have not been included in the individual’s taxable base for personal income tax (PIT) purposes, or if the PIT Act exempts this type of income (the expenses are not traceable to a particular individual).
When it comes to examining a company’s events for compliance with the definition of staff sustainability events, we need to bear in mind that a staff sustainability event should in principle cover all of the company’s employees, rather than a particular individual. The CIT Act is silent on the following questions:
In the absence of uniform rules, these questions will be decided by the purpose of an event: staff motivation or team building. However, if the company holds an event that can be attended only by particular employees (from one function, team, department etc), this does not qualify as a staff sustainability event for CIT purposes.
If an online staff motivation or team-building event is attended by all the employees and the company provides everyone with a meal during the event (food being delivered to their homes), the State Revenue Service states that although catering expenses would qualify as SSEE during an in-person event, they do not qualify as such during an online event. Online catering expenses should therefore be charged to PIT and national social insurance contributions because those are traceable to a particular individual, so they would qualify as business expenses that do not go into the taxable base for CIT purposes.
In our view, this interpretation of the rules is not fair because regardless of external conditions, it is in the best interests of companies to take care of staff motivation and team building, especially in today’s changing conditions. This opinion also implies that the CIT and PIT treatments vary according to how an event is held (in person, online or possibly a mix), which is not fair on taxpayers who do not have the opportunity to hold events in person.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionSeveral EU member states are taking the taxation of employee share ownership plans in startup companies a step further. Their national rules make share plans far more attractive to startup employees and provide a more founder-friendly environment. While the rules aim to ensure startups give their employees a stake in the company, there are many solutions countries can use to achieve this goal.
As stated in the conclusion of the first instalment of this article, foreign markets offer various litigation funding models. In addition to the model we analysed before, where the claimant’s litigation is funded by an institutional litigation funder – an investment fund specialised in litigation funding, in this article we are looking at available alternatives. This overview covers some of the less familiar and sometimes unusual sources of litigation finance whose successful use would reduce the number of cases where a lack of finance limits the legal remedies available to a litigant.
Every now and then corporate groups decide to undertake a strategic restructuring of their assets, including a transfer of assets to one or more group companies for financing another activity. Using a contribution in kind to increase a company’s share capital raises a number of important legal and tax issues. In this article we will explore whether a contribution in kind attracts VAT, as well as assessing the need to adjust the input VAT deducted on the contribution and the right to deduct the input VAT on services acquired for the contribution, such as expert valuation services and legal advice.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.