Other opportunities
Download Print

How to distinguish state aid from normal market transactions 1/39/24

Sarmīte Zakovska
Senior Associate, PwC Legal

What is the market economy operator principle?

The market economy operator principle (also known as the ‘private investor test’) is an analytical tool the European Commission uses to prevent companies from obtaining advantages through the State intervening in a particular market. This requires a complex economic analysis and legal justification to assess whether a hypothetical private investor would make a comparable intervention in the particular market on the same conditions as the State. If the answer is yes and the transaction is consistent with the market, this is unlikely to be considered state aid because the other party (company) has not obtained an economic benefit it would not have obtained under normal market conditions.

How to assess whether equivalent activity is possible in the market

The Commission (and the State – the provider of aid) should put itself in the recipient company’s shoes and assess whether the advantage obtained (e.g. credit guarantee, capital injection or debt write-off) could also be offered by other companies in this market. If the answer is yes, the market economy operator principle should be applied and a further assessment carried out.

It’s especially important to consider whether a transaction is economically, commercially and financially sound at the time of being carried out, given its short-term or long-term prospects of profitability and other commercial or economic interests concerned. According to the CJEU case law, any ex post economic assessments retrospectively demonstrating the profitability of an investment are not sufficient.1

Any costs and benefits of the State as a government agency that are related, for instance, to employment levels or an increase in national revenue, social or regional development and other policy considerations, should be ignored in applying this principle. This is because a hypothetical market operator being used for comparison would ignore such considerations at the time of making an investment.

Tests applied to assess particular cases

Each separate case warrants the use of different tests aimed at comparing the State measure in question in the most appropriate manner, especially considering its nature, with a measure that a private market operator could take in a similar situation and under normal market conditions.2

The CJEU settled case law offers four tests3 (see the image below):

How to determine whether a transaction is consistent with the market

According to the CJEU case law and the European Commission’s decisions, there are several ways to determine whether a transaction is consistent with normal market conditions, divided into two main categories.

Conclusion

PwC experts have vast experience in representing government agencies and private companies across all aspects of applying the state aid rules, including the market economy operator principle. If you need any help with these matters, our experts are happy to advise and support you.

____________________________________
1 CJEU ruling of 5 June 2012, Commission/EDF, C-124/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:318, paragraph 85
2 In this meaning see CJEU ruling of 6 March 2018, Commission/FIH Holding and FIH Erhvervsbank, C-579/16 P, EU:C:2018:159, paragraphs 52 and 55
3 CJEU ruling of 17 November 2022, Volotea SA and easyJet Airline Co. Ltd/European Commission, on joint cases C-331/20 P and C-343/20 P, ECLI:EU:C:2022:886, paragraph 110 and the case law mentioned in it

Share the article

If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com

Ask question