On 9 September 2021 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled on a dispute over the tax authority’s right to refuse a VAT refund if the taxable person fails to duly submit documents the authority has requested to prove the person’s refund claim is valid. This article explores CJEU findings and Latvian case law.
Silver level subscribers have access to full content, including articles and archive, useful resources, as well as subscribers have an opportunity to ask questions to PwC consultants.
For Bronze level subscribers and Free trial users access to certain sections of MindLink.lv will be limited.
Detailed information in section "Subscribe".
Subscribe Sign inIf you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionDebt assignments are widely used in business. A debt assignment allows the company to turn its trade receivables into working capital. The sale (assignment) of a debt is increasingly taken to mean the transfer of a debt arising from consumer credit to licensed debt recovery service providers in order to recover the debt out of court. In practice, debt assignment has a wide range of uses – it is also used by lenders that take the original creditor’s place, including individuals investing in lending platforms.
The VAT treatment of debt assignments is not straightforward and may vary according to the characteristics of each assignment. It is also a misconception that debt assignments do not require an evaluation of their VAT treatment. This article explores how debt assignments are treated for VAT purposes.
The Public Benefit Organisations (PBO) Act defines a donation but the concept of sponsoring remains undefined. In practice, companies that sponsor events organised by PBOs might wonder whether sponsoring has the same tax treatment as a donation. This article explores the tax implications of sponsoring PBOs.
On 21 May 2019 we informed MindLink.lv readers about Ruling C-235/18 Vega International issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on VAT treatment where a company provides its subsidiaries registered for VAT in various EU member states with fuel cards for various fuel suppliers and arranges payments between those subsidiaries (the actual consumers of fuel) and the actual suppliers. Based on this CJEU ruling, the Latvian State Revenue Service (SRS) has issued guidance on the VAT and excise treatment of fuel card transactions. This article explores their opinion on applying tax rules to fuel card transactions.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.