To continue the fight against money laundering and sanctions breaches, members of the European Parliament sitting on the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs called attention on 28 March to the need for tighter conditions in combating money laundering, terrorism and proliferation financing (“AML”) as well as sanctions breaches. These committees have drawn up a package of documents containing three draft laws, which the European Parliament is to debate in April.
The package of documents includes the draft laws outlined below.
The uniform rules will include tighter conditions for running client checks, for identifying beneficial owners and ownership structures, and for using anonymous financial instruments, such as cryptocurrency. In future, persons subject to AML legislation, e.g. managers of various financial assets and crypto-assets, as well as real and virtual asset agents and high-level professional football clubs will be required to verify their client identities and determine the origin of their funds and ownership structures. These persons will also have to identify money laundering, terrorism and proliferation financing risks or typologies prevalent in their industry and report those to the supervisory bodies.
To impose tighter restrictions on cash transactions and dealings in crypto-assets, there are plans to set thresholds on payments that persons subject to AML legislation are permitted to accept from clients. For example, a threshold of EUR 7,000 will apply to transactions in cash, which several EU member states have already included in their national law, and a threshold of EUR 1,000 will cover cryptocurrency transactions where a client cannot be identified or is anonymous.
The fight against sanctions breaches involves separate rules on golden passports and residence permits, making it illegal to obtain a passport or residence permit if investment is made in a particular country.
The 6th AML directive is to include rules for national supervisory bodies (e.g. the Latvian Financial Intelligence Unit) and their operations in Latvia, as well as for how the supervisory bodies and persons subject to AML legislation can access reliable information, i.e. the registers of beneficial owners.
It’s also emphasised that the member states’ supervisory and other competent institutions must have access to information on beneficial owners, bank accounts and property registers in order to discover money laundering schemes and to freeze assets early. Since some goods are more suitable for money laundering than others, the EU committee members want the member states to aggregate information on ownership of goods such as yachts, jets and cars worth in excess of EUR 200,000, as well as on goods kept in tax havens.
A more important amendment to the 6th AML directive involves the definition of a beneficial owner, where the committee members agree that the beneficial owner must be an individual that owns at least 15% (currently 25%) plus one share or voting power, or some other direct or indirect ownership, or 5% plus one share if the client operates in an industry that is exposed to a higher risk of money laundering, terrorism and proliferation financing.
Looking at the topical question of access to information on beneficial owners, which has been widely publicised in recent months, we should mention that the committee members have included conditions that the registers of beneficial owners:
This newly formed authority will monitor risks and threats within and outside the EU by carrying out increased supervision of credit institutions and financial institutions. The original plan is to place under the AMLA’s supervision 40 entities with the highest risk profiles based in at least two member states. At least one entity is to be chosen from each member state for increased AMLA monitoring.
For monitoring purposes, the AMLA may ask entities and their employees to file documents and other necessary information and may pay on-site visits. If breaches are detected, the AMLA will have the power to charge fines of EUR 500,000 to EUR 2 million, or 0.5–1% of the responsible person’s annual revenue, while material breaches may be fined up to 10% of the person’s revenue for the previous financial year.
Although these draft laws have yet to be approved and await the EU Parliament’s session scheduled for April, it’s important to familiarise yourself with the proposals now and monitor the latest developments.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionAmendments to the Proof of Identity Act that came into force on 1 September 2022 will also affect entities that are subject to the Anti Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism and Proliferation Financing Act (“AML/CTPFA subjects”). If you want to keep your client relationships then you should evaluate how the amendments will affect them, and you should adopt solutions that will allow you to legally continue those relationships.
As Russia continues the war in Ukraine, the US and the European Union (EU) together with other countries keep increasing the size of sanctions imposed on Russia.
At the EU summit held on 30–31 May 2022, the European Council agreed on the sixth package of sanctions against Russia that will mainly apply to crude oil and petroleum products supplied to EU member states. Yet the Council of Europe has agreed a temporary exception for crude oil supplied through pipelines. Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, has said that the restrictions included in the package will in fact stop around 90% of EU oil imports from Russia by the end of this year.
As the size of the sanctions grows, confused companies are having more and more questions about how to cope with the increasing sanctions burden, whether a company is supervised by particular regulatory bodies, and whether the current sanctions rules and guidelines provide for setting up an internal control system to manage sanctions risk.
If a company finds it is governed by the Anti Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism and Proliferation Financing (AML/CTPF) Act, it has two priority steps to take: register as an entity subject to the Act after stating a type of activities governed by the Act, and appoint an officer responsible for ensuring compliance with the Act’s requirements under section 10. This appointment must be reported to the relevant supervisory authority such as the State Revenue Service or the Financial and Capital Markets Commission.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.