We have analysed the CIT treatment of doing business with companies on the blacklist of uncooperative tax havens earlier. This article explores new changes to the list and how they affect transfer pricing (TP).
Recent months have seen repeated changes to the blacklist of uncooperative tax havens due to geopolitical risk pressures.
From 1 November 2023 the list again includes Antigua and Barbuda, Belize and Seychelles because these jurisdictions have failed to share tax information on request.
The British Virgin Islands has been delisted after improving its rules for sharing information on request to meet the OECD standard.
Costa Rica, too, is off the list – the EU Council finds this country has successfully restructured its tax exemption scheme for foreign-source income and eliminated some harmful conditions.
Another delisted jurisdiction is the Marshall Islands, which has made excellent progress in meeting the economic substance requirements.
So the updated list now has 16 jurisdictions, including Russia, which is subject to a toxic preferential tax scheme for internationally sanctioned state holding companies and persons close to them.
Recognising Russia as an uncooperative tax haven has raised the question of TP compliance in taxpayers that are still doing legal and transparent business with non-sanctioned Russian companies despite the massive boycott, their decision to stay in the Russian market being based on humane considerations and rational calculations.
Latvian TP rules list four cases that require a taxpayer or a permanent establishment to assess the need to prepare and submit TP documentation, i.e. whether they do any business with:
The picture below shows how Latvian TP requirements apply:
Traditionally, all cases involve calculating the total amount of goods and services acquired and supplied. A taxpayer that exceeds the first threshold of EUR 250,000 must prepare a local file and submit it to the State Revenue Service on request. Exceeding the second threshold of EUR 5 million requires the taxpayer to prepare and voluntarily submit a local file within 12 months after the end of the relevant financial year. Once his total transactions reach the third threshold of EUR 15 million, he is liable to submit a master file, too.
One thing to note is that the first three cases are about related-party transactions. When it comes to doing business with companies from uncooperative tax havens, including Russia, it no longer matters whether they are related or unrelated. With Russia on the blacklist, a taxpayer doing business with Russian companies may face a higher TP risk from 2023 if he fails to assess his obligation to document TP compliance of his transactions early on.
In such cases a Latvian taxpayer is required to demonstrate arm’s length compliance for any transaction with any Russian-registered entity or individual.
As the deadline for submitting TP documentation in companies with the standard financial year is 31 December (for the previous reporting period), we encourage you to get in touch with our transfer pricing team or email your questions to lv_transfertcenas_info@pwc.com to find out more about your obligations arising from the tax and TP regulatory requirements.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionTransfer pricing (TP) experts of the State Revenue Service (SRS) have agreed to meet up with Latvian TP consultants on several occasions in late September to debate some pressing TP concerns and to set out the SRS opinion on how to solve current and future TP problems. In this article we will outline SRS comments on TP validation and look at some of the topics and questions put up for debate with the SRS.
On 12 September 2023 the European Commission published its proposal for a transfer pricing (TP) directive to align TP requirements across the EU. While most of the member states, including Latvia, are to some extent applying recommendations made by the OECD TP guidelines, the European Commission is proposing the directive and calling on the member states to adopt the same TP standards in order to secure a level playing field. If the new rules are approved in their current version, they will be passed into the member states’ national law by 31 December 2025 and applicable from 1 January 2026.
It’s been quite a while since Latvia adopted new transfer pricing (TP) rules, yet the State Revenue Service (SRS) did not issue guidelines on charging fines for breaches of requirements for duly submitting or preparing TP files until late September 2023 (approved by SRS order No. 201 of 11 September 2023). This article explores the new guidelines.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.