With the labour market crossing national borders, Latvian employers are looking abroad to attract not only management talent but also routine workers. As the Covid-19 crisis lingers on and the significance of remote work grows, Latvian companies are increasingly wondering about the best ways to employ foreign workers, especially if they work remotely from their home country.
A Latvian company employing a foreign tax resident abroad and entering into a direct contract of employment should carefully assess the following legal and tax questions:
If a company employs a foreign tax resident abroad, in most cases this creates an obligation to pay local payroll taxes (personal income tax and national social insurance contributions or similar payments) from day one. Exclusions are possible when a resident of Latvia or another country is employed abroad. And this employment will be governed by foreign employment legislation, such as labour law.
So hiring a foreign worker takes extra time and money to become familiar with the foreign law, draw up an employment contract and offer a remuneration package according to the foreign law. It may be necessary to complete statutory tax registrations for the employer and/or the worker and carry out tax administration properly (calculating, reporting and paying wage tax to the local tax authority).
The Latvian company also has to assess the risk of a permanent establishment (PE). Having a PE creates an obligation to register for foreign CIT purposes, attribute to the PE, based on transfer pricing principles, some of the profit the company makes through the work done by the worker, and pay CIT.
Depending on their functions and tasks, workers doing work abroad for the Latvian company may create a PE for the company, for instance, in the following cases:
Each situation should be assessed on its merits, considering the foreign law, available exclusions and double tax treaties, as well as the tax authority’s approach.
In summary, PE risk is high if a company employs workers in a foreign country that enter into contracts or help create the company’s product or service. On the other hand, PE risk is low if workers carry out general business development activities and search for business contacts abroad. PE risk is also low if workers arrive in a foreign country on brief business trips only.
For the purposes of this article, a PEO is an organisation that takes a company’s place in legally employing a worker to carry out work for the company. The PEO becomes the employer of record performing the hiring function.
Over the years the PEO functionality has evolved and the range of activities it undertakes has widened. In addition to the payroll accounting function, a PEO currently also provides –
Performing such functions used to require multiple service providers in various countries, but the PEO now provides all these services in one place.
Engaging a PEO in the country where the worker is working ensures the PEO undertakes most of the employer obligations in dealing with legal and tax issues, i.e. the PEO handles all necessary formalities related to legal requirements, immigration rules and tax calculations.
For example, a Latvian company wishes to enter into employment contracts with IT professionals, including five Polish tax residents doing work physically from Poland. Employing these professionals directly would require the Latvian company to gain and apply knowledge about the scope of Polish labour law and tax treatment, as well as potentially registering for Polish tax purposes and filing monthly reports. So additional resources would be necessary not only to start such employment but also to maintain it. Acquiring these services from a PEO resolves most of the issues.
The PEO model is also used to mitigate PE risk. Although it does not completely eliminate this risk, our experience suggests that tax authorities do not claim a PE for companies using PEO services unless it is found that the PEO has been used for tax evasion, including to eliminate PE risk.
Remember, there is no PE risk only if the company carries out no activities in the foreign country and has no staff there.
In summary, the PEO model allows Latvian companies to employ professionals abroad, mitigate legal and tax risks, and organise employment according to local requirements. Yet this model does not fully protect you from all risks, for instance, PE risk.
The question of employment is currently relevant not only in Latvia but also globally. When it comes to employing foreign workers or workers abroad, you need to assess the risks and statutory requirements in order to successfully achieve your company’s strategic and growth objectives with no adverse implications.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionThe global situation is still making us look at each other through a screen, and we have come to think of this as everyday life. A business trip is now more about connecting to another online call than boarding a coach or plane to attend a client meeting or a professional training course. Introducing a brief series of articles on payroll taxation, this one explores the tax treatment and obligations of an employer sending a worker on a business trip and paying for their accommodation and meals. We will be writing about other tax law interpretations we have received from the tax authority after we asked questions relevant to our clients preparing for the income tax filing season.
If a company finds it is governed by the Anti Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism and Proliferation Financing (AML/CTPF) Act, it has two priority steps to take: register as an entity subject to the Act after stating a type of activities governed by the Act, and appoint an officer responsible for ensuring compliance with the Act’s requirements under section 10. This appointment must be reported to the relevant supervisory authority such as the State Revenue Service or the Financial and Capital Markets Commission.
Entering into contracts for services is an inevitable part of business, but this cannot be undertaken without fully assessing inherent risks. Over the years the courts have developed sufficient case law allowing us to make conclusions about how they approach situations that involve assessing the nature of a legal relationship to determine whether the contract is one for services or one of employment. This article explores some of the case law that prescribes the conduct of parties entering into either type of contract.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.