Inheritance tax is payable by individuals that receive property or money from a testator. Rates and exemptions may vary from country to country according to the degree of relationship between heirs, the inherited value and other criteria. Latvia has not introduced inheritance tax. This article explores the Finance Ministry’s proposal for introducing inheritance tax in Latvia, as identified in the report ‘An assessment of the current workforce cost situation and proposals for future action’, a tax policy planning document.
Latvia does not collect inheritance tax, except for a few cases of personal income tax (PIT) being charged on inherited capital from pension schemes or on the income of copyright heirs clearly defined in the PIT Act. No PIT is payable on gifts from the spouse or relatives up to the third degree. The policy planning document published in June includes proposals for introducing inheritance and gift tax in Latvia to reduce income inequality and increase national budget revenues. Such a tax has been introduced in many OECD countries, including Lithuania.
Based on Lithuania’s experience, inheritance tax is payable by individuals that have inherited real estate and movables (including securities and money). The tax base is 70% of the inherited assets, and the tax rate depends on the inherited value and the degree of relationship between heirs. For example, an inheritance of up to EUR 150,000 is taxable at a rate of 5%, while an inheritance exceeding this threshold attracts a rate of 10%. The fiscal impact of inheritance tax on the budget generates revenue ranging from EUR 1.95 million in 2020 to EUR 3.11 million in 2022.
As regards gifts, Lithuania does not charge gift tax on gifts from relatives. In other cases a 15% PIT is charged on the excess of a gift over EUR 2,500 as long as total gifts do not exceed 120 average salaries.
In the light of Lithuania’s experience and the prevalence of inheritance tax in OECD countries, the Finance Ministry has drawn up a proposal for introducing inheritance and gift tax if an inheritance or a gift exceeds EUR 500,000 a year. The rate of inheritance tax would be 1%, it would be payable by the recipient of the inheritance or gift, and its fiscal impact on the national budget is estimated at EUR 1–3 million. A similar proposal for introducing inheritance tax is included in the national research programme ‘Reducing the shadow economy for sustainable national development’. While a particular rate applicable on inheritance is not specified, introducing this tax would generate an estimated revenue of up to EUR 11,200,000 a year based on the information available from the national registers on stamp duties paid by heirs entering their legal title on the land register.
Despite what the report says, the proposal poses questions and challenges, for instance:
Introducing inheritance and gift tax in Latvia is a complex matter associated with the public debate over the last three years and political consensus on how this tax will benefit the public at large, so we will be monitoring how the proposal develops among the policymakers.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionOn 17 October 2023 the EU amended its blacklist of uncooperative tax havens that are subject to special taxation procedures. The blacklist now contains 16 jurisdictions, including Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, the Republic of Seychelles, and Russia. As 2023 saw the list being amended several times, there are certain tax aspects that may raise questions, yet national law does not always provide the answers. In this article we take a look at what the Ministry of Finance (MOF) and the State Revenue Service (SRS) think about the tax treatment of a Latvian-resident individual’s income from a substantial participation in a foreign company, including dividends from a blacklisted tax haven.
The Constitutional Court (CC) ruled on 13 June 2024 that provisions of the Personal Income Tax (PIT) Act are consistent with section 105 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to property. The ruling was passed after the Administrative Regional Court and Riga City Court disputed the PIT Act’s provisions requiring payment of PIT on gambling and lottery winnings regardless of what the gambler has paid to play the game.
The peculiar procedure for calculating and paying solidarity tax (ST) often has taxpayers wondering about its link with other Latvian taxes: personal income tax (PIT) and mandatory national social insurance (NSI) contributions. Confusion about ST’s essence and mechanism may lead to a dispute with the tax authority and even litigation. This article explores one of the latest cases heard by the Latvian Supreme Court regarding an ST payer’s request for a refund of PIT wrongly paid by making ST payments in Latvia.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.