The Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Act has been amended only slightly during 2021, as we wrote in our Flash News edition of 20 April 2021. This article explores the latest changes to the CIT Act as well as amendments being proposed for the near future, including the long-awaited rules for bad debt provisions under IFRS 9 Financial Instruments.
Provisions made under IFRS 9
When preparing the CIT return for December 2021, many companies were planning to add their bad debt provisions to the tax base for the first time because those would have exceeded the time limit of 36 months after they were made. That is why companies welcome amendments that will release provisions made under IFRS 9 from this requirement, as they are based on a different set of criteria and were not consistent with the substance of a bad debt provision when they were made.
There are also plans to pass amendments by the end of the year that will insert in section 9 of the CIT Act some exceptional conditions a company has to meet before it can take an exemption: the company holds an appropriate auditor’s report; each trade receivable included in the provisions (credit losses) can be traced; and procedures for recognising, recovering and derecognising receivables (financial assets) are in place. The new conditions will apply to trade receivables covered by provisions (credit losses) made after 2017.
However, if a provision made in this way applies to a truly bad debt the company has expensed and which will not have been recovered within 60 months after it arose when the customer was supposed to pay the supplier, and the receivable is ineligible for an exemption under section 9(3) of the CIT Act, then provisions made under IFRS 9, too, will have to be added to the tax base.
Other bad debt provisions
There are plans to extend the period during which a company has the option of keeping its bad debt provisions out of the tax base in the following situations:
Accordingly, bad debt provisions can stay out of the tax base on the CIT return for December 2021.
The CIT treatment of interest expenses and the current thin cap restrictions are facing a number of important developments, as section 10 and transition rules of the CIT Act and the Covid-19 Act are being amended.
Covered bond entities
Covered bond entities organised and existing under the Covered Bonds Act are governed by amendments to the CIT Act already in force. Thus, covered bond entities will not be required to apply the thin cap restrictions, and for companies paying interest to covered bond entities, those interest payments will not create any additional CIT expense.
Special relief in 2021 and 2022
To cope with the adverse impact of Covid-19 on the financial position of companies, there are plans to waive the current cap on any loan interest that does not represent a CIT item in 2021 and 2022. The Covid-19 Act provides for these amendments.
Net interest cost
There are also plans to change the way of measuring interest costs so that companies can calculate net interest – the difference between interest payments and interest revenues (if any). However, this approach will be allowed for only one of the two methods, i.e. if the company’s interest costs exceed EUR 3 million a year. These amendments are to apply from the financial year beginning in 2021.
Estimated interest arising under IFRS 16
Interest estimated on an operating lease in companies applying IFRS 16 Leases can stay out of their thin cap calculation if that lease is essentially an operating lease. This new provision, too, applies to estimated interest from the financial year beginning in 2021.
If you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionWe have already commented on the corporate income tax (CIT) treatment of flow-through dividends and looked at personal income tax (PIT) relief available to an individual receiving a dividend. This article explores potential pitfalls in the tax treatment of flow-through dividends if a change of shareholder takes place shortly before the company decides to distribute a profit.
This article explores the corporate income tax (CIT) and personal income tax (PIT) treatment of financial transactions between a Latvian company and its owner (an individual) in two examples:
From 1 January 2022 companies investing in a closed alternative investment fund will be allowed to exclude from their tax base any income the fund earns when selling shares in a company it owns, according to amendments to the Corporate Income Tax (“CIT”) Act effective from 20 April 2021. This article explores the rules and how this treatment could affect the fund’s investment disposal strategy.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.