Deducting input VAT, particularly on capital goods, is based on their intended use for taxable supplies. Intentions sometimes fail to materialise, raising the question of whether the taxable person becomes liable to repay the VAT deducted earlier. This question was handled by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Ruling C-293/21 of 6 October 2022. This time the CJEU examined the need for adjustment if the taxable person did not use the acquired goods and services for making taxable supplies because the shareholder decided to liquidate the company. This article explores the CJEU’s findings and their practical implications.

A hire purchase is different from a lease in terms of various economic risks and VAT treatment. Although the customer is allowed to pay the purchase price by instalments, the supplier is liable to calculate and pay VAT on the entire amount of the transaction. This VAT treatment is not new, yet we have had to deal with situations where a taxable person has missed this important difference or finds it difficult to determine what kind of transaction is in fact taking place. This article explores key differences between the two transactions for VAT purposes.

To pick up where we left off about “contributions in kind” and VAT last week, this article explores a less common form of business – limited and general partnerships that make a “contribution in work” under a partnership agreement.