The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has examined a question that often faces Latvian taxable persons. May an excessive price of advertising services and the fact that they are not clearly necessary for the company’s business give the tax authority grounds for denying a deduction of input tax on the advertising expenses? This article explores the court findings and their practical implications.
Silver level subscribers have access to full content, including articles and archive, useful resources, as well as subscribers have an opportunity to ask questions to PwC consultants.
For Bronze level subscribers and Free trial users access to certain sections of MindLink.lv will be limited.
Detailed information in section "Subscribe".
Subscribe Sign inIf you have any comments on this article please email them to lv_mindlink@pwc.com
Ask questionDrafted by the Budgetary and Fiscal Committee, endorsed by the Cabinet of Ministers and passed by Parliament, amendments to the VAT Act are waiting to be announced by the President of Latvia. The amendments are mainly related to changes in other pieces of legislation or meant to take over several VAT directives amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax. This article explores what we see as key amendments.
When goods are supplied to a person in another member state, one might wonder how VAT should be properly applied if the customer has not presented his VAT registration number, yet he is known to be a trader. Is this an intra-Community distance sale or an intra-Community supply of goods? Since the VAT treatment varies, it is important to understand the features of each transaction.
The surge of online trading has more and more businesses not only selling their own goods but promoting sales of third-party goods through various electronic interfaces (e.g. marketplaces, platforms or portals). Under amendments to the VAT rules effective from 1 July 2021, in certain cases interfaces promoting third-party supplies are responsible for collecting VAT instead of the seller. This article explores cases in which the taxable person (interface) is considered to have acquired the goods and sold them on, becoming a deemed supplier.
We use cookies to make our site work well for you and so we can continually improve it. The cookies that keep the site functioning are always on. We use analytics and marketing cookies to help us understand what content is of most interest and to personalise your user experience.
It’s your choice to accept these or not. You can either click the 'I accept all’ button below or use the switches to choose and save your choices.
For detailed information on how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please visit our cookies information page.
These cookies are necessary for the website to operate. Our website cannot function without these cookies and they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
These cookies allow us to measure and report on website activity by tracking page visits, visitor locations and how visitors move around the site. The information collected does not directly identify visitors. We drop these cookies and use Adobe to help us analyse the data.
These cookies help us provide you with personalised and relevant services or advertising, and track the effectiveness of our digital marketing activities.